Short List!
Oct. 1st, 2008 02:57 pmThese cities all meet enough of the requirements to be strong contenders, so I’m beginning to poke them. There have been a few recent suggestions that I haven’t had chance to look at yet as well :)
My main con coming up here is nom-nom factor which I am measuring under these rough terms (the lost kids test, which is macabre and fun :P):
Your kids are lost in the woods:
REALLY HIGH nom-nom factor
The kids are already dead. Any search party will take heavy casualties and will return with an eternal fear of shadows in the darkness and an infinite respect for Mother Nature’s wrath
HIGH nom-nom factor
The kids will die of exposure before being found. Months will pass before anyone stumbles on the bodies
Moderate nom-nom factor
The kids are lost but with a LARGE concerted search effort we may just find them before they get in trouble.
Low nom-nom factor
Bothersome, gather some neighbours together, sure of finding them
Very low nom-nom factor
You worry about them meeting a stranger in the woods and being kidnapped (i.e. the chances of them running into other people are high)
Non-existant nom-nom factor
Called the kids on their mobile phones and told them to get home. They stopped in the forest gift shop on the way
A less macabre test
You’re heading to the woods with your lover for some public sex0ring.
Really high nom-nom factor
There are easier ways to have a suicide pact
HIGH nom-nom factor
You’re being followed by a film crew recording “natural born survivors” or are planning a really cheap “divorce”
Moderate Nom-nom factor
You find a place for your sex0ring but keep near the edge of the wood
Low nom-nom factor
You can go just about anywhere in the wood for your romp and not worry about being distracted or getting lost.
Very low nom-nom factor
You can’t actually use the wood for sex0ring without being arrested because there are so many damned people around
Non-existant nom-nom factor
You check into a log cabin hotel, buy condoms from the vending machine and order room service to bring up some whipped cream.
( Read more... )
My main con coming up here is nom-nom factor which I am measuring under these rough terms (the lost kids test, which is macabre and fun :P):
Your kids are lost in the woods:
REALLY HIGH nom-nom factor
The kids are already dead. Any search party will take heavy casualties and will return with an eternal fear of shadows in the darkness and an infinite respect for Mother Nature’s wrath
HIGH nom-nom factor
The kids will die of exposure before being found. Months will pass before anyone stumbles on the bodies
Moderate nom-nom factor
The kids are lost but with a LARGE concerted search effort we may just find them before they get in trouble.
Low nom-nom factor
Bothersome, gather some neighbours together, sure of finding them
Very low nom-nom factor
You worry about them meeting a stranger in the woods and being kidnapped (i.e. the chances of them running into other people are high)
Non-existant nom-nom factor
Called the kids on their mobile phones and told them to get home. They stopped in the forest gift shop on the way
A less macabre test
You’re heading to the woods with your lover for some public sex0ring.
Really high nom-nom factor
There are easier ways to have a suicide pact
HIGH nom-nom factor
You’re being followed by a film crew recording “natural born survivors” or are planning a really cheap “divorce”
Moderate Nom-nom factor
You find a place for your sex0ring but keep near the edge of the wood
Low nom-nom factor
You can go just about anywhere in the wood for your romp and not worry about being distracted or getting lost.
Very low nom-nom factor
You can’t actually use the wood for sex0ring without being arrested because there are so many damned people around
Non-existant nom-nom factor
You check into a log cabin hotel, buy condoms from the vending machine and order room service to bring up some whipped cream.
( Read more... )