sparkindarkness: (Default)

 

There are increasing movements forwards with legislative battles with our rights – a new trans bill in Canada, marriage equality in Britain, France and various parts of the US, municipal anti-discrimination laws in various cities and even a battle in the Ukraine which was rather surprising. Of course, it’s not all going forwards everywhere, far from it, but there’s a lot of excitement.

 There’s also a sense that “zomg we’ve nearly won” primarily from straight allies, coupled with a sense of “the GBLT rights movement has moved so quickly!”

 I have to burst the bubble on both. Starting, perversely with the second one.

 The whole idea of “the GBLT rights movement has moved so quickly” is based on that pervasive myth that we only appeared in 1960 and that the first piece of GBLT activism was Stonewall. Both of which are wrong. GBLT people have existed as long as people have existed – and we have been fighting for centuries. The first attempted same-sex marriage in the UK happened in 1680 and Molly houses were a fixture of the 19th century. France decriminalised “sodomy” after the revolution, Germany had, in the 1920s had a vast amount of pro-GBLT activism

 And this is from a frankly extremely amateur view of history since I make no claims of being a historian. But even the most cursory search finds not only our existence the earliest times but a centuries old battle against persecution. To call the GBLT rights movement a young or a new movement is to spit in the face of these people who fought – and who died – and who straight history has long forgotten. We have not moved quickly, it has been a long slow fight that has been denied so long that it’s only recent victories for basic LEGAL PROTECTIONS that have finally accelerated.

 Now addressing the first point. Winning these battles means we win the SIMPLE part – and not close to being done. The COMPLICATED is, in many ways, only just beginning.

 Firstly, let’s be clear that SIMPLE doesn’t mean EASY, nor does it mean UNIMPORTANT. It makes we know pretty much exactly what to do and, in many ways, how. I know how to walk to London. One foot in front of the other isn’t complex. Walking that distance in this weather would be arduous, painful and an incredible feat – Simple but difficult.

And achieving equality under law: Hate crimes protection, anti-discrimination protection, marriage equality – are extremely difficult, powerful achievements – and they’re simple. Simple because we know exactly what has to be done – the law has to change and we know how that is done. Difficult to do, but simple in terms of process

And important because these form not only essential tools, but also a foundation. It’s an impossibly powerful message of inequality when the laws treat us as lesser citizens; it’s a loud message. It’s hard to get people to listen to you demanding acceptance, respect and challenging hate when the law of the land is roaring “ACTUALLY! HATE THESE FOLKS! HATRED IS FINE! TOTALLY LESS THAN YOU! LESS CITIZENS! ACCEPTABLE TARGETS, GET THEM HERE!” It’s a foundation and without it, building anything is going to be shaky

 


But a house isn’t finished when a foundation is built and nor will our battle for equality be finished because we have full equality in law. Law and practice, society and culture are often very separate. If you need any greater proof just consider the fact that these legal rights we’re fighting for? Other marginalised groups already have them – and they’re still marginalised.

 On this foundation we need to fight institutional oppression. We need to change professions that are deemed to homophobic to tolerate us (or more than a few token members). We need to tackle bullying – adult as well as child. We need to tackle family acceptance and positive messages so more kids aren’t raised in self hate and familial rejection. We need to remove every single temptation to be closeted – not the closet, forcing us all to be Out is never right – but remove the motivation to being closeted in the first place. Conversion therapy needs to be banished into the past, the DESIRE to change needs to be seen as alien and weird. We need to remove the negative connotation, we need to banish slurs from the language, we need to have “gay” stop being a synonym for “bad.” We need inclusive portrayals, not be considered an afterthought or obscene, we need healthcare that acknowledges our needs, we need workplaces that have more than just policies, but co-workers and bosses and customers who won’t try to drive us out. Neighbourhoods that don’t blink to see us among them. We need a world were institutional cissexism and heterosexism doesn’t constantly fence us, drive us out or police us. We need religions that won’t preach homophobia and transphobia as morality. We need a world without hate, without contempt, without derision. We need so much more (this list went on so long I’ve had to delete huge chunks to keep it manageable), things we will not achieve by laws, things we cannot achieve by laws (but policies can certainly make a difference) but things that will rest on a foundation of those laws.

 We need a world where we are as loved and respected and accepted and included as straight, cis people. Only then will we have won

 And that? That’s going to take lifetime upon lifetime to build.

 This isn’t really something even the most optimistic of GBLT people need telling – we live our lives, we know what will and will not change, we know how we’re oppressed, we know how we’re attacked (in fact, straight people telling us what we should and should not be focusing on need to shut up, really, they do). But I’m increasingly getting the feeling that many allies are expecting to down tools and say “yay we won!” and then be really really shocked when we don’t stop fighting.

 So let’s celebrate the victories and progress we’ve made and are making – because they’re definitely worth celebrating – and then dive back in the trenches, because we’ve got a long war to right.

 


sparkindarkness: (Default)
It seems that, yesterday, someone (I’m assuming annoying, homophobic note-leaving freak who is sorely in need of a hobby) left a paper-back Bible by our front doorstep.

Unfortunately, yesterday and this morning we were busy with things other than checking if this fool had left more nonsense on our door.

It has rained a lot since then. It has been windy. It is also possible paper shredding cats have had fun. So now the front of our house is liberally decorated with mushed up soggy paper, with the odd legible Bible verse.

I am not pleased by the extremely-religious-soggy-confetti look. And it’s frankly miserable to clear up all this wet, muddy gloopy gunk and we’re probably going to be fining scraps for weeks.

If you’re going to leave your passive-aggressive little holy book on my doorstep at least spring for a water-proof cover, damn it.
sparkindarkness: (STD)

Or so it seems. In fairness, we should add “allegedly” all over.

But while considering that, please pull up a chair and join me in another big slice of schadenfreude pie (damn if they keep this up I am so going to put on weight from this pie) while we watch Bishop Eddie Long

Bishop Eddie Long is not very friendly to GBLTQ rights – no no he is not. As leader of a rather large megachurch, he peddles his hatred on a grand scale. He is one of the “culture warriors” fighting tooth and nail to dehumanise GBLTQ people as much as he can every chance he gets

And he is now being charged with pressuring male teen employees into having sex with him It has now risen to 3 claimants

Yep, get yourself another piece of that sweet sweet pie

I really am beginning to feel it’s almost beyond a joke now. Are we seeing a pattern yet? There are so many of these utterly repressed gay homophobes so deep in the closet that I think Tumnus gets more action than I ever did! Isn’t it getting awfully crowded in the back there?

The homophobic hater closet is bigger than Imelda Marcoss shoe closet.

And I do think this is a victory. I think when the hypocrisy of hate mongers is exposed, it is always a victory, another step forwards. And this is definitely

sparkindarkness: (STD)

I’ve been musing about a common refrain whenever someone talks about large institutions, parties and organisations that, alas, have some pretty major problems attached. Instantly I hear the counter message “but not all X are like that” “not all X believe that” and even “by saying that, you’re erasing the X believers who don’t think that!”

And I have several points to make on this, yes yes I do.

First of all – there’s an old adage that if it’s not about you don’t make it about you. Well don’t. If someone is talking about the Tories’ gross homophobia and you are the one Tory out there that’s actually pretty ok with gay people and are just hypnotised by Cameron’s hair. Then, well done, someone talking about homophobic Tories probably isn’t talking about you. However, the Tory party/Catholic church/Mormon Church/Anglican church/Republican party/whatever do all have severe homophobia problems. When you pipe up with “but not me!” or “but not all of us!” are you adding something to the issue or distracting from the major problem the organisation has? Are you trying to resolve the problem by speaking up, or trying to deny it, defend it or diminish it? Because, you know, there’s a reason why these organisations are seen as implacably homophobic. That would be because they ARE. Their leadership, their policies, their agendas, their power, their wealth, their influence are all thrown very much behind championing homophobia. To say otherwise is a denial of reality. To try to distract from it is to defend it.

To the next point – even if you don’t share those beliefs, that stance, you can still support it. No, I’m sorry, you are. With money, with votes or with your mere presence, you are supporting them and their bigotry.  Sometimes this is obvious – a vote for the Tories obviously supports the Tories. Money given the church obviously supports the church

Why do people listen to the Pope? I mean, the man is a bigot. He is a truly hateful, vile person. He is up to his neck not only in a sex scandal – but in a scandal that involved the abuse of children. He has all the moral authority of a drug dealer with blood stained hands. But he is still listened to. He is still covered by the media and he is still revered. Why?

Because there are a billion Catholics in the world. Simple as.

This old bigot is given a voice because he is the head of an organisation that claims a billion people as members. By their presence and affiliation, that billion people empower the pope and his organisation – and his bigotry.

I’m not saying that all Catholics (or other religious org members or political party members) should instantly leave or they are terrible terrible bigots nor does it mean that being a member of these orgs makes them a bigot. But it DOES mean you are supporting and empowering an entity that is bigoted. Even if you are working to change it, even if you don’t agree with it, even if you’re the nicest person in the world – you are empowering bigotry.

And that must be hard to face, I know it must – but it’s simple truth. And by all means say “I know the church/party is homophobic and that by being part of it I increase it’s power – but X is so important that I cannot sever ties.” And I, personally, respect that. Ok, yes, a part of me, quite an angry part of me, is hearing you say “X is more important than treating you like a real person” which I aren’t exactly shiny and jolly about, but I also understand that some issues, some traditions, some cultures and some matters of faith are deeply important to people to such an extent that, yes, it is more important to them. I don’t have to like it, but I can respect that.

I can see that you feel the need to tolerate and even empower homophobia for deep and personal reasons – but don’t deny that that is what you’re doing. Don’t pretend that your personal disapproval of such attitudes in any way counters the real damage your organisation is doing – the damage you are enabling, encouraging and empowering.

And lastly – do not play the token. You know how when someone says something grossly homophobic then always always always turns round with that gay friend who is totally fine with them screaming Leviticus at them while wishing they burn in hell?

Don’t be that friend. Don’t be the gay Tory or the non-homophobic Tory who somehow magically proves that the Tories aren’t homophobic. Don’t be the token member being used to distract from the real problem. Don’t act like your personal opinions somehow overwhelm decades – centuries – of past and present homophobic abuse. Don’t pretend your personal conviction somehow redeems and entire homophobic organisation. Don’t derail, don’t distract and don’t justify and protect homophobes because in many ways that is a greater betrayal of us than being another prejudiced member of a prejudiced organisation.

Profile

sparkindarkness: (Default)
sparkindarkness

April 2015

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728 2930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags