sparkindarkness: (STD)

This piece originally appeared at Womanist Musings where Renee has very generously allowed my random musings to appear on her excellent blog

Do you know what? There are some things that are repeatedly said to me, that really set my teeth on edge. They really really annoy me, to a point where one day I am sure my head will explode out of sheer irritation. It will be messy. I must remember to bring plastic sheeting.

They annoy me beyond reason. I mean, even more than Beloved seasoning food after I’ve cooked it?

Even more than him putting things away while I’m still using them.

Even more than door-to-door annoyers knocking on my door at 9:00am on a Sunday morning.

EVEN more than the damn 10 feet of snow (possible exaggeration) that has kept me housebound and made me miss a holiday (and, to make matters worse, certain Canadians aren’t snowed in despite my frequent comments about polar bears, igloos and wintry wastelands).

The following is a list (that will be so non-inclusive, because I’m remembering more, as I write this), of some of the things that people not only say around me – but say around me so often, that I may carry little cards around with answers pre-written. Or maybe engraved onto the head of an axe. Yes, I think I’ll go with axe.

“You’re so cute together!”

Kids playing dress up are cute.

Small, fluffy animals are cute.

Maybe your children going on their first date are cute.

Couples that have lived together for the best part of a decade? “Cute” (or “sweet”) isn’t the adjective. It’s demeaning. It’s diminishing. It’s reminiscent of patting a kid on the head who has learned a new trick.

“You’re just like a married couple!”

You’re just like a clueless person! And that’s because you are one! Just as we’re just like a married coupled because we ARE a married couple! Shocking isn’t it?

Saying we “look like” what we are tells me you think we’re imitating, faking. It irritates me, it does.

“Married? What.. oh you mean civil partnered!”

Damn, you’re right! Y’know, I totally forget all the time that real marriage isn’t for the likes of me, thank you for reminding me.

I know that ‘legally’ we’re not married, ok. But I really do appreciate not having that rubbed in my face (which, btw, as an acquaintance reminded me the other day – your Hen Night in a gay bar does strike me as rather tasteless. You’re merrily celebrating something that most of society deems the inhabitants of that bar are unfit for. Maybe it’s because you have a lot of gay friends, then cool – but if you’re coming to ogle the gay guys? Um… yeah)

If I’ve said “married” then I’ve said it for a reason – and that reason isn’t because I need someone to teach me.

“I bet I could turn you!”

Noooope, pretty certain if a decade or so of familial pressure didn’t do it, then your boobies really don’t have that kind of power

Look, I know it’s meant as a joke, and gods know I’ll flirt with anything with a pulse so long as they know that it’s a game, I’m incorrigible like that

But, y’know there are a whole lot of forces out there that do try to “turn” me and mine… and it’s not a happy fun process. You can’t turn me and all you’re doing is reminding me of those who have tried – and those who would try.

“You’re one of the girls”

Well damn, my husband is going to be real disappointed about that and it’s really going to ruin our sex life, him being gay and all. Oh wait, nope, I’m still a man. I’m a gay man, not a girl. Don’t assume being gay makes me female. Denying that gay men are actually men or that lesbians are actually women is pernicious, annoying and a very narrow definition of both gays/lesbians AND gender.

“Oh you’re the woman, teehee!”

No, still no. Do I have a sign on my head that says “not a man” or something? Not only am I female here, but I’m “the” woman – is that like the only woman in the world ever or something?

Related to the age old question “which one’s the woman?”which is always most annoying (because no relationship can possibly work if it doesn’t imitate straightness), this goes a step further and decides outright to put one of us in the box (ok, me. Because it’s always me) based on… what? Stereotype? My hair? My height? My build? Messages from beyond, magic 8 ball, what?

“You two kissing is so hot”

Well… thank you. Because I really needed another reason to be uncomfortable about PDA. Not only do I get to worry about people throwing bottles at my head (advantage of them throwing bottles at the head, though, is out of several dozen, I think only 3 have ever hit) but now I also have to deal with the drool puddles and the vague need to shower afterward.

“Kiss for us”

Gods no. Go rent some porn if you want to get off. I’m not your performing porn monkey – and I don’t care if it’s a gay bar (in fact, I take issue with this crap happening in what is supposed to be our safe space) or pride and I’m perfectly safe (ha! For a given amount of safe). I know when I’m safe thank you, and even if a legion of gay commandos were stood ready to protect, I still prefer to kiss Beloved only when I want to, not on command for an audience.

Now were are my gay commandos, I like a guy in uniform I do.

“Can I get a picture?”


What is this, the zoo? Come see your Greater Spotted Gay? Go photo the bonobos if you want to get a pic of exotic primates. No, I do not want an entry in your scrap book. And, again, doing this in safe spaces is more offensive not less so – apart from anything else, do you not realise how rude it is to take random photos in a gay bar? Not everyone here is out, not everyone here can afford to be identified as being here.

“Can I get a picture of you kissing?”

Yeaaah, do I even have to say how wrong this is? As an added bonus, this is not just from a complete stranger, but from several complete strangers! I’d say it’s worse coming from a stranger than a friend, but only because my friends have a clue. And even use it on occasion :P

I will never understand how people cannot see that finding gay people hot and sexy – and expecting a performance – is a positive thing – let alone how they can present it as being pro-gay. Being a fetish is better than being a victim, but being a person is much better than both.

“Let me tell you lots of details about personal problems I expect you to give advice on!”

Dear Jane, I’m a gay man and for some reason people I barely know expect me to give advice on their personal problems despite my not caring even slightly. How does one inform people that gay =/= agony aunt? Does it involve axes? Tell me it involves axes.

See, I love feeling I can help my genuine friends (and even family on occasion). I love talking through their problems with them and either helping or at least being a friendly ear/shoulder and sympathising and working through the rant with them. And I’ll be first in line when it’s “we’re going to eat a full cake/tub of ice cream and rip into someone” time. I’ve even made the cake. And it was good cake.

But having a whole lot of TMI dumped on me by someone I barely know the name of bemuses me in the extreme. (I’m especially amused by straight guys asking me advice about their wives/girlfriends. Why they expect me to have more experience of intimate relationships with women than them bemuses me in the extreme. But then… buying her a washing machine for Christmas? Really, man? Really?). I don’t know where this stereotype came from, but between my job and my sexuality I could start my own advice column.

“This is Sparky, my gay friend.”

Has Ms. Manners introduced a new etiquette convention? Does one normally introduce someone by their sexuality? Is this to prevent stealth gayness? Or is it a form of bling, now? Here’s my prada handbag, my gucci shoes and lo, my gay friend?

Well at least you establish to people I’m a token from the very first introduction, saves them having to work it out. They might actually start talking to me as if I were a real person!

“What do you think of my shoes?”

I don’t. They’re shoes. Does anyone actually think about shoes? Actually in this weather I think you’re going to slip and fall and break your neck or your toes will get frostbite and then you’ll get gangrene. They are death shoes. They are trying to kill you. Put them down and we will destroy them in a controlled explosion before they murder you.

This concludes my full knowledge and interest in fashion – especially shoes. If it’s fashionable, it’s trying to kill you.

“But are they sexy?”

They’re SHOES! Except to shoe and/or foot fetishists is it actually possible for a shoe to be sexy? And they cover feet! In my books feet are on par with ears, nostrils and back hair on the body-part-sexy ladder

I am astonished at the number of people who expect me to care about their footwear (and why is it always shoes? Honestly I get asked about shoes more than every other article of clothing put together. Is there a secret shoe code no-one’s clued me in on? Is there a manual?)

Despite these answers, I still get asked for fashion advice. Even when advocating controlled explosions for footwear. It’s almost a compulsion. Even Beloved gets asked for fashion advice – have you seen what he wears?! If he started going out in a hessian sack it’d still be better than half of what’s in his wardrobe!

“But you’re like SOOOO gay.”/”But you’re not gay-gay”

No, I am a new category! UBER GAY! Gayer than the gayest thing ever!

See, this one always bugs me, the idea that being gay is somehow an analogue state. You can be sorta gay or very gay or too gay or not gay enough… or… I don’t know, I manage to be all of them at the same time. And my gayness levels always seem to be a problem.

Maybe I should install a dial? Hey, straight folks, adjust dial for the correct amount of gayness for the situation. I mean, don’t you just hate it when you introduce your GBF and he’s just totally not gay enough? There you are, expecting sparkles and rainbows and at least one comment about the bloody shoes and he goes and talks about politics or the stock market or the mating habits of bonobos (curse those dirty dirty bonobos) But then you’re walking through a normal bar or down the street or something and he’s being such a complete homo and it’s embarrassing you could just dial it down again couldn’t you?

Maybe we could get a remote control for advanced usage? Fabulous moment needed! Pump up the gay! Oh, no, boss in sight, quick turn it down turn it down!

Ok this is getting longer than I thought. Wow and there’s so many more. I shall have to write them down, I shall.

I’m generally not mortally offended by these (GENERALLY), but I am perpetually irritated. What especially frustrates me is not just how often these are repeated (over and over and over and over again) but by the fact that they’ve all been said (repeatedly) by people who would vociferously call themselves the proest of pro-gay allies. Heh and maybe it’s a huge your mileage may vary issue and others love them massively  (repetition with someone who clearly isn’t impressed is, however, still annoying).

But I want axes. Big ones.

sparkindarkness: (STD)

Ok, I am a coffee lover, a complete and dedicatyed lover of the holy bean

Which means, 90% of the time, I don’t drink instant coffee. Because it is an abomination and a sin

But sometimes you need coffee and you need coffee now damn it and I’m not waiting for the perculator to sort itself out before I can have a drink when I can boil a kettle and have an emergency cup of ye-gods-this-is-not-coffee while I wait for my oh-thank-all-that-is-holy-for-the-blessed-beverage to be made.

So we have an emergency stock of kenco in the cupboard – it being the instant not!coffee that is the closest to being actually drinkable of all the brands (Nescafe? You should be shot. Somewhere where you will bleed slowly).

Now, Kenco comes in a BIIIIIIIG glass jar of 200g of coffeeish granules. It costs £3.00

Or you can get the new packet they’ve advertised – a refill packet which they are heavioly advertising as environmentally friendly – 97% less packaging! They even call it the “ec0-refill”.

See? Environmental! Good for the environment! Isn’t that wonderful?

Except the refil pack holds 150g.  And costs £3.58

Did you see what they did there? 200g jar for £3.00 (of recyclable glass no less) Or 150g Eco-refill pack for £3.58.

Yeah. My not amused face, I’m wearing it

And this hacks me off so much not just because of the blatant rip off – it’s a rip off using “green language.” And that hacks me off because every corporation and even government is doing it. We can slap “green” on anything with precious little standards, even oil companies do it! And governments will spout green and environment while inevitably talking about tax rises.

Will being environmental cost more than being inefficient, wasteful and polluting? Yes, it will. But be clear about that. If we’re going to have green taxes then ear mark the money to go for environmental transfers and research. If you’re going to have green products, don’t try to con us that it costs, what, the best part of a pound more to  put coffee in a plastic wallet rather than a glass jar.

Because that is the narriative now. Green = rip off. Green = someone’s pulling a fast one. Y’know what? I think, even cynical me, that most people in the county DO want to do something about the environment. Oh, they’re too lazy too most of the time and too short sighted too the rest – but no small amount of damage is being done to that already limited and conditional will by governments and corporations exploiting that wish to make money

We do not want or need people to think that “environment” means “another con job”.

sparkindarkness: (STD)

One of the many many things about homophobia that make me rage is how readily tolerated it is – and how ready people are to excuse it, defend it and deny it.

It saddens me that I need to repeat this  – but, if you think gay people are worth less than straight people, if you think we deserve less than straight people, if you think we don’t have the same value as humans, if you think we aren’t due the same rights, if you think it’s ok to discriminate against us for being gay, if you think hate speech against gays is ok, if you think pushing wide sweeping stereotypes about gays is ok and most certainly if you think there should be any kind penalty or punishment for being gay then you are a homophobe.

Homophobia. Not just privilege, not just bias, not just ignorance, not just foolishness. It’s homophobia. It’s bigotry. And it’s not even slightly ok. Stop mincing words. Stop dancing for fear you may offend the bigots. Stop twisting in a desperate attempt to RESPECT those who have zero respect for us. Stop minimising hatred because it makes us look angry or extreme – extreme? Is it ‘EXTREME’ to expect to be treated like a person?

If you make excuses for any of this, if you enable any of this, if you try to justify it or distract from it then you are enabling, encouraging, justifying and distracting from homophobia.

This is homophobia. You cannot say “I’m not a homophobe, but gays don’t deserve X, Y, Z right” you can’t say “I’m not a homophobe, but {derogatory gay stereotype}” you cannot say “I’m not a homophobe but {sweeping statement about gay people}”. Saying “I’m not a homophobe” does not make it so.

Do you know what excuses, justifies or mitigates homophobia?

Nothing. Homophobia is treating people as less than a person. As wrong. As broken. As less. It is not justifiable. It is never acceptable. And that includes when you say “I don’t justify homophobia – BUT..” because we’ve seen that so many times, haven’t we? “I’m not a homophobe, BUT…” “what they did was wrong, BUT…” We all know what that means and how much credence we give it. No amount of saying “I don’t justify homophobia…” means a THING if you follow it with “but” and do just that.

Do you know what ‘reason’ or ‘explanation’ for homophobia makes it ok?

None. Not one. Ever.

Not religion, not culture, not the fact people have been the victim of oppression themselves, not the “realities” of politics, not ‘democracy’, not morality, not history – NOTHING makes homophobia ok or anything less than an utterly bad thing.  It’s never a ‘difficult’ subject or ‘debateable’ or freaking ‘controversial’ because the hate comes from the pulpit or from a sincere moral code or a particular cultural context. Homophobia is wrong and inexcusable – ALWAYS.

And do you know when gays are to blame for homophobia?

Never. No matter what the gay leadership has done, no matter whether you disagree with priorities, no matter if you think campaigns were bungled, no matter how many personal bad experiences you’ve had, no matter whether you think Pride Parades are icky or you’ve never met a gay person. No matter if the gays haven’t ‘reached out’ to you enough, no matter if the gay folks didn’t talk to you enough – because gods forbid we not spend enough time trying to convince you we’re people due respect! No matter if you hate the stereotypes, no matter if you only dislike “those” gays (whatever ‘those’ means), gay people are never ever to blame for our oppression.

And these lessons need to be learned no matter how basic they should be. Because we haven’t absorbed them and even people who consider themselves progressive and allies are making them. It has got to a point where some forms of homophobia and vessels of homophobia simply CANNOT be discussed because there is such a storm of defending, distracting and desperate desperate attempts at denial that the homophobia can never ever be touched. And this is by people who consider themselves allies.

Even GBLT people are all too willing to accept that it’s our fault, that we should play nice and all to damn willing to accept tokens and gestures and smile because we’ve been conditioned to expect and deserve so little – accept blame that we’re only too willing and ready to take on our shoulders. How many times do we fawn over a statement, a gesture, the crumbs from the table? How many times do we make nice with people who think we’re only unworthy of “some” rights? How many times are we restrained because the bigotry came with a smile? How many times do we try to hold back our anger and our criticism, even to silence other GBLTs? – oh no, we can’t call them homophobes, it may annoy them! It may insult them! It’s so harsh! We’re damaging our cause by being angry at bigotry.

When we are treated as less because we are gay, it is homophobia, it is bigotry and it is wrong. Call it what it is. Homophobia is not our fault. It is not due to anything wrong with us, anything we’ve done, anything we‘ve said. Homophobia is only EVER the fault of the homophobe and nothing we do can change that.. Homophobia is never right, never acceptable and never defensible.

And not only does the world need to learn that – but we need to learn that, because too many of us are eager to make the rods for our own backs.

sparkindarkness: (STD)

I am not a big fan of the food industry, I has ranted before I have

Now normally we cook everything from as few processed beginnings as possible. But, of course, Beloved has done the shopping hasn’t he?

I’m not sure why we need 5 boxes of cereals since we don’t actually eat cereals. But there they are, in our cupboard now, probably being bullied by the biscuits.

Naturally we  discussed these cereals at length. In detail. But without heavy objects – so far. But one of Beloved’s defences was that they’re HEALTHY! Though he did try to hide the Kelloggs’ Honey Crunchy Nut Clusters when making such a bold claim. He waved the museli in my face – “healthy!” he yelled!

And indeed the box did mention all the lovely fibre and have lots of nice green labels with big words about healthy diets and all the usual advertising gumf. Sparky was not impressed and read the box:

Amount of Sugar in 100g of Honey Crunchy nut Clusters? 25g
Amount of Sugar in 100g of Museli? 24.9g (Though in the museli’s defence it had negligible salt, the Clusters had virtually a gram per bowl).

And y’know what? That pisses me of muchly. Because the powers that be are screaming at us about an obesity epidemic and all the grossly over the top warnings about how everyone is getting fatter and how very very very terrible that is *eye roll* and they lecture us – we need to be healthier! We need to eat better! We need to be slimmer and eat less fat and less sugar and less salt! OR THE WORLD WILL END!!!!

Well, y’know what? Here Beloved tried (kinda) to eat healthily. And no doubt thousands of people around the country are doing the same thing. They went out and bought a breakfast cereal that has all the taste and texture of the contents of a hoover bag  (our hoover does have a bag, yes. Because while we do have a Dysan with its silly ball, one trip falling down the stairs revealed that the REASON, Mr. Dysan, most vacuum cleaners don’t have a ball is because it’s bloody fragile) because they wanted to be healthy. I mean museli? That’s what it’s FOR, right? So they’re chewing their way through this sawdust, trying, really trying to do what the powers that be are lecturing us about – and failing. They may as well be eating a bowl of sickly, syrupy, nasty honey & nut crunchy nut clusters.

And yes, I am using the 100g readings because they’re nice and standard. Why? Because across the 5 boxes there seemed to be no consensus as to exactly how big a bowl would be. The Museli was fairly honest with a measure of 50g. Others passed off 25g as a serving. Uh-huh…

And this is what bugs me so much. Perhaps instead of lecturing the naughty naughty people about being so naughty in their naughty food choices, oh the naughtiness, the powers that be could take steps to make it so eating healthily (not necessarily the same as losing weight) wasn’t so damn HARD? Perhaps they could look at policing a product claiming to be healthy, perhaps ‘healthy’ food like yoghurts and museli should have to more clearly announce “hey, I’m full of sugar!” perhaps we shouldn’t let labels like “low fat” be used as a distraction from the huge sugar and salt content.

Perhaps, if we want people to eat healthily, we should poke to food industry into making that actually POSSIBLE. Or, better yet, easy.

sparkindarkness: (STD)

Today we can look across the Atlantic and see some beautiful examples of activism. Dan Choi, James Pietrangelo and Robin McGehee have been arrested for a DADT protest at the White House (Dan Choi and James Pietrangelo remain in prison without bail) and other brave people have staged a sit in over ENDA at Nancy Pelosi’s offices in DC and San Francisco

And, of course, there is some hand wringing and hyperventilating and even a clutching of pearls. This isn’t polite, this isn’t respectful, ZOMG he was in UNIFORM how terribly disrespectful to the military establishment (which, y‘know, is TOTALLY owed respect from GBLT people, right?

It seems we need to remember something – rights are not given, they‘re demanded. People shouldn‘t have to ask freaking politely to be treated as people. When pointing out that you are treated like a second class citizen it is done with a scream, not in a whisper following a polite cough if

They’re angry. Why aren’t you?  Because there’s damn good reason for it. GBLT rights in the US on a federal level have stalled rather badly and there seems to be little or no movement from the people in charge to get it moving again. Virginia is removing the GBLT protections it had, leaving people very much in the lurch. Putting gay rights on the ballot box nigh inevitably results in a whole bunch of straight people screaming “that’s for REAL people, silly homos” and receives zero support from the powers that be.

Guess what? While you’re being polite and quiet and calm and asking “please sir, can we have some rights?” the haters are still screaming.

The Catholic church has had so many child rape scandals now that it barely even counts as NEWS any more! But despite systematically protecting and covering up child rapists across the globe, they’re still presuming to MORALLY judge us and speak against US?! They present US as a threat to families while shuffling around child abusers to protect them from justice!

In the laughable DADT hearings (and the mere fact there are HEARINGS is repellent – seriously you need yet ANOTHER study to see if gays are as good as straights? How is this even remotely ok?) the arsehole ex-general Sheehan blames the presence of openly gay soldiers in the Dutch military for the massacre of Srebrenica. You get that? GAYS cause massacres. Why wasn’t this man just removed from the hearing?

Dr. Rowan Williams, the bigot in charge of the Anglican church finds it highly regrettable that a Lesbian has been made a bishop in the US. Of course, this is the same man who didn’t crack his damn TEETH about the Uganda kill-gays law. Yet, still, the man uis viewed as some kind of moral authority.

It has now come out that GBLT people matter so little that we can be excluded from clinical trials, especially about family, partnership or sex issues. No scientific reason, just keep the GBLTs out – of course, discrimination against GBLTs is perfectly legal in many places (and certainly not a priority to overturn – the straight powers that be have more important worries) and why treat us like people when you don’t have to?

The American healthcare bill looks like it’s going to be passed through reconciliation. And the GBLT provisions? Stripped. An easy sacrifice to make by straight legislators.

DADT is a sick, ridiculous game to force soldiers to play – and Jene Newsome played that game. She wasn’t asked. She never told. She quietly lived with her partner – and then the police found her marriage certificate and, in what could only be considered an act of spite, outed her to the military. She has now been discharged.

Who do you think is listened to? The GBLTs at the back waiting their turn to be considered people because the straight people have “more important” things to get on with – or the loud, frothing haters who are vehemently and furiously fighting and shouting against everything GBLT people have every step of the way? What do you thinks going to happen – more pandering to the loud haters, more discrimination which is the NORM – or them listening to you quietly asking to be treated as people?

If you’re not angry, you’re not paying attention. And maybe Dan Choi, James Pietrangelo, Robin  McGeehee and the brave people in the sit-ins are right are right. Maybe it’s past time for GBLT voices to be louder than the haters. Maybe it’s time to stop asking and start demanding. Maybe it’s time to display the anger – the real and justified anger – that the GBLT community seems to have lost along the way.

We have a right to our anger, we have bloody good reasons to be angry and maybe the powers that be need reminding of that.

Profile

sparkindarkness: (Default)
sparkindarkness

April 2015

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728 2930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags