![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sparkindarknessIt amuses me that both Jan Moir and Nick Griffin have both claimed something very similar.
Jan Moir is convinced there is an orchestrated campaign of a liberal cabal attacking her (possibly lead by Stephen Fry - HAIL STEPHEN!)
Nick Griffin is spitting his dummie out and stamping his feet because he thinks he was ambushed at Question Time and it was organised to be biased against him.
Well, here's a news flash kiddies - there's no conspiracy, no cabal, no slanted bias, not attempt to tip the scales against you.
You're just awful people.
Jan Moir - you wrote a disgustingly homophobic article that was grossly offensive and truly repugnant to read. It didn't take a cabal or an organisation to drag you down - you wrote something so horrible that that many people were offended by it. Simple as. Yes, they did read it (she's taken to claiming no-one has read it) and it was offensive and repellent. No organisation, no bias, no campaign needed - thousands of people read your article and were disgusted. Because it was disgusting. Simple, isn't it?
Nick Griffin - everyone at Question Time focused on you. Everyone hated you. Everyone asked hard questions and everyone attacked you and made you look like a fool
This wasn't because it was set up to be biased. It is because they all hated you. The audience. The panelists. The presenter. Hells, I bet the film crew and the boy that brought the coffee hated you too. You're a loathsome person representing a loathsome party espousing loathsome views. They piled on you because their hatred of you outweighed ANY political differences they may have had with each other. Their hatred of you outweighed any other political discussions they may have wanted to have. Because you are that awful, that repugnant and that objectionable a person and represent a party that is all that and more that it outweighs anything else. To them it was either attack you or ignore you as not worth their time.
They didn't have to go out their way to an audience who hated you. MOST PEOPLE DO. For the BBC to have picked out a sizeable number of BNP supporters in the audience (which means finding people who are both BNP supporters AND willing to go on national television displaying themselves as such) they would have had to expressly worked to create a bias FOR the BNP. As it was they had an extremely diverse cross section of British society. And most of that hates you, Griffin. But the, you hate most of them as well.
We don't need to organise against you. You're vile enough to inspire opposition without it.
Jan Moir is convinced there is an orchestrated campaign of a liberal cabal attacking her (possibly lead by Stephen Fry - HAIL STEPHEN!)
Nick Griffin is spitting his dummie out and stamping his feet because he thinks he was ambushed at Question Time and it was organised to be biased against him.
Well, here's a news flash kiddies - there's no conspiracy, no cabal, no slanted bias, not attempt to tip the scales against you.
You're just awful people.
Jan Moir - you wrote a disgustingly homophobic article that was grossly offensive and truly repugnant to read. It didn't take a cabal or an organisation to drag you down - you wrote something so horrible that that many people were offended by it. Simple as. Yes, they did read it (she's taken to claiming no-one has read it) and it was offensive and repellent. No organisation, no bias, no campaign needed - thousands of people read your article and were disgusted. Because it was disgusting. Simple, isn't it?
Nick Griffin - everyone at Question Time focused on you. Everyone hated you. Everyone asked hard questions and everyone attacked you and made you look like a fool
This wasn't because it was set up to be biased. It is because they all hated you. The audience. The panelists. The presenter. Hells, I bet the film crew and the boy that brought the coffee hated you too. You're a loathsome person representing a loathsome party espousing loathsome views. They piled on you because their hatred of you outweighed ANY political differences they may have had with each other. Their hatred of you outweighed any other political discussions they may have wanted to have. Because you are that awful, that repugnant and that objectionable a person and represent a party that is all that and more that it outweighs anything else. To them it was either attack you or ignore you as not worth their time.
They didn't have to go out their way to an audience who hated you. MOST PEOPLE DO. For the BBC to have picked out a sizeable number of BNP supporters in the audience (which means finding people who are both BNP supporters AND willing to go on national television displaying themselves as such) they would have had to expressly worked to create a bias FOR the BNP. As it was they had an extremely diverse cross section of British society. And most of that hates you, Griffin. But the, you hate most of them as well.
We don't need to organise against you. You're vile enough to inspire opposition without it.