sparkindarkness: (Default)
[personal profile] sparkindarkness
[Error: unknown template qotd]

Edwardian, definitely. or maybe ancient rome, the decadent years.

But, let's be honest, only if I was very very rich. Because being an Edwardian pauper? Not so much fun





ETA: Ok this wasn't suppsoed to be a post, it was supposed to be an answer to Makarov's post. Don't know what happened here.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 01:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] janetmiles.livejournal.com
Me, I kind of like the present. Indoor plumbing, cars, antibiotics, that sort of thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 02:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] logophilos.livejournal.com
I'm with you. And living in Rome as a pauper wouldn't be a hell of a lot of fun either.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 03:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bladespark.livejournal.com
Yeah. Much as certain aspects of various past eras appeal to me, there are WAY too many modern things that I would miss. Computers! Hot showers! Books!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 06:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thisdaydreamer.livejournal.com
That's what I was going to say.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 06:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meridae.livejournal.com
I'd be a trouble making suffragette in Victorian London. I would, however, have an indulgant Daddy who guarenteed me a life time income of somewhere around a thousand pounds a year. When I wasn't campaigning for the vote, I'd be swanning around Europe with my chaperone/lesbian lover.

Bwahahah.

Profile

sparkindarkness: (Default)
sparkindarkness

April 2015

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728 2930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags