It’s a freaking WINDMILL!
Dec. 12th, 2007 02:36 pmThe NIMBYs are out in force again and it really makes me wish I had a ready supply of axes to run around the countryside with merrily chopping at anyone wearing tweed.
See, they’re always trying to put wind farms in our area (“why oh why are we persecuted!?” scream the NIMBYs. Because it’s freaking WINDY here, you muppets. We have a nice, strong prevailing wind.) and a group of people have gathered together as “dedicated environmentalists” to stop it.
Yes, that’s right. They even lurk on corners with clipboards asking you to sign petitions to stop “hideous industrial buildings polluting our pristine wilderness.” They’re talking about wind turbines.
These hideous polluting buildings are WINDMILLS. White, elegant WINDMILLS. These are polluting industrial buildings? Because I think they’re pretty.
But, y’know what, let’s look at our options here, shall we?
Option 1: We give up on the whole electricity thing, it’s not like we need it right?
Option 2: Pretty pretty windmilll
Option 3: Coal fired power plant. You can have it in your back garden - because that's better right?
See, they’re always trying to put wind farms in our area (“why oh why are we persecuted!?” scream the NIMBYs. Because it’s freaking WINDY here, you muppets. We have a nice, strong prevailing wind.) and a group of people have gathered together as “dedicated environmentalists” to stop it.
Yes, that’s right. They even lurk on corners with clipboards asking you to sign petitions to stop “hideous industrial buildings polluting our pristine wilderness.” They’re talking about wind turbines.
These hideous polluting buildings are WINDMILLS. White, elegant WINDMILLS. These are polluting industrial buildings? Because I think they’re pretty.
But, y’know what, let’s look at our options here, shall we?
Option 1: We give up on the whole electricity thing, it’s not like we need it right?
Option 2: Pretty pretty windmilll
Option 3: Coal fired power plant. You can have it in your back garden - because that's better right?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 03:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 06:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 03:40 pm (UTC)If they want to stop hideous industrial buildings polluting their pristine anything, why aren't they picketing coal plants? Manufacturers of any sort? Anything having to do with automotive travel? For that matter, why are they using the electricity from the sources they despise?
::pries hypocrite rant button up, climbs down from soap box, tells choir that they can go home and the preaching is over::
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 07:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 03:43 pm (UTC)And if I hear the phrase 'spoiling our glorious British countryside' once more, I'm going to vomit. Having half of it under salt water is not spoiling it much worse?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 08:46 pm (UTC)And it's not like we're talking pristine forests, we're talking farm land and tamed fields. It is sio much better than the alternatives
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 03:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 08:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 03:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 08:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 03:57 pm (UTC)Is there any way you could counter picket them? Maybe with a survey that mentions the negative effect that acid rain caused by coal power plants has on the pristine wilderness and how wind turbines could help solve this problem?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 09:13 pm (UTC)We're already getting our own petitions, especially near them to make it clear how ridiculous they are
Actually some people are doing a mock "sign up for more coal power plants, want global warming?" And then point at them "sign there!"
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 01:20 pm (UTC)On the up side for wind power, Donald Trump had his planning permission refused for his big golf project in Scotland. He'd effectivly been blackmailing the local council into cancelling an off-shore wind farm project that had been in development since before he had submitted his request, saying that he didn't want to build a resort of the wind farm was there. Hopefully the building of it can go ahead now
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 05:43 pm (UTC)Well, apart from the Severn Bore - it's been estimated that alone could provide 5% of the UK's energy requirements.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 04:26 pm (UTC)... And these people are stupid. They need to be whacked upside the head with fishes.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 09:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 04:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 09:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 10:51 pm (UTC)But besides that, nothing.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 05:52 pm (UTC)But...but...they're for the GOOD of the environment...ANTI-pollution...I...
People make my brain hurt.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 12:17 am (UTC)Don't you just hate it when people hijack good causes for their own selfishness
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 06:39 pm (UTC)And they are pretty!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 12:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 06:50 pm (UTC)Bite my shiny metal ass
bunch of luddities!!
WIND power rocks!!
so does Solar power
so when they shove a petition in your face, ask them if they WANT to go back to the pea-soup fogs?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 12:34 am (UTC)Aye, windmill on every gable, solar pannel on every roof!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 07:35 pm (UTC)*mumbles* It's too early for this amount of idiocy.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 01:08 am (UTC)I have yet to find a time of day that makes their idiocy palatable. But early morning is a hard hard time
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-12 08:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 01:09 am (UTC)Yep, some people just want the world to remain stagnat. I never understand them
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 12:28 am (UTC)Because it takes a couple hundred square feet that you could otherwise farm to put up a harvester of one of the least environmentally harmful ways of producing power on the planet . . .
How about whales? I know technically they are mammals, but could you make an exception and slap someone with one?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 01:46 am (UTC)I know, it's just incredible how thye can object to something so... inherently non-objectionable. It;s like hearing people object to kittens
I think it is the only appropriate response, though it's going to do my back in
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 02:32 am (UTC)Us? We still <3 our coal and smog and oil. Wind farms are dangerous! And they kill birds. And um, yeah. Other bad things. Coal is better!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-13 07:01 am (UTC)But then, I'm feeling a bit bitter.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-14 06:08 am (UTC)