![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sparkindarknessThe title to their vile question has been changed. After the net exploded and even the political parties contacted the director general to see if he was out of his tiny mind, the title was change to ""Should Uganda debate gay execution?""
Uh. That's better but it's not much better.
Again, there is no debate here. There should be no debate here. If we rejected the topic "should Muslims face execution?" and instead went with "Should France debate Muslim execution?" then we'd still be outraged.
Because this is NOT a question. This not something to be considered. It's gross bigotry and you CANNOT give even the slightest indication that it is acceptable to kill gays - ANYWHERE.
Gods, how hard is this to understand?
IMPLYING THAT KILLING GAYS IS A REASONABLE POSITION FOR DEBATE OR CONSIDERATION IS GROSSLY HOMOPHOBIC, DAMAGING AND THREATENING.
Changing it to a single country rather than in general DOES NOT CHANGE THAT
Uh. That's better but it's not much better.
Again, there is no debate here. There should be no debate here. If we rejected the topic "should Muslims face execution?" and instead went with "Should France debate Muslim execution?" then we'd still be outraged.
Because this is NOT a question. This not something to be considered. It's gross bigotry and you CANNOT give even the slightest indication that it is acceptable to kill gays - ANYWHERE.
Gods, how hard is this to understand?
IMPLYING THAT KILLING GAYS IS A REASONABLE POSITION FOR DEBATE OR CONSIDERATION IS GROSSLY HOMOPHOBIC, DAMAGING AND THREATENING.
Changing it to a single country rather than in general DOES NOT CHANGE THAT