And the bad side of the whole thing
Nov. 8th, 2008 06:17 pmAmendments in Florida. Arizona and California all passed, enshrining bigotry and hatred into these states’ constitution
And that is what it has done. Denying the right to marry is a horrendous thing. It undermines and devalues relationships. It devalues and disrespects people. It denies protections that are essential and NON-IMITABLE. This law has seriously harmed thousands upon thousands of people for no benefit. I have said on numerous occasions just how essential the right to marry was, so there’s no point in repeating it other than to say that denying it was a truly evil thing to do.
But it is more than that, though that is horrendous, this has done a truly awful things: It has given legitimacy to homophobia.
The constitutions of 3 states, the people of 3 states, have just said homophobia is ok. Homophobia isn’t bad. Homophobia is acceptable. Homophobia is officially sanctioned. These states and the people who voted for these vile measures in these states have said that homophobia is good and right and should be enshrined in law.
I’ve said before that homophobia is one of the few “acceptable” prejudices. It’s one of the prejudices you can wear openly and even drip with venom and it still not be considered rude or outside of civilised behaviour . These 3 states have not only confirmed that but they have given it the stamp of approval. These states have given a green light to prejudice and waved the flag for bigotry.
Homophobia is ok to these states. And that in turn says that being gay is NOT ok. These states have enshrined in their constitutions that gay people are less. That gay people are not worthy of the same rights or respect or consideration. In these states, it is official, so official they had to enshrine it in their most fundamental documents: Gay People are Inferior.
And that’s a great message to send, isn’t it?
I can feel the rage about these passing - feel and share it. But it needs to be directed appropriately. A lot of the anger has been aimed at ethnic minorities who voted disproportionately for the Californian amendment. Yes, the fact that a large number of black* people who voted in Cali voted for proposition 8 is certain an issue for concern and belongs on the list of Shit that Needs Sorting but to blame it on an entire race is beyond stupid - as well as prejudiced. (Apart from anything else, logistically black people don't have the numbers to have been a deciding factor on the vote - don't let prejudice and a convenient scape goat colour outrage)
Believe me, nothing would please the right wing bigots more than for gay people and black people to fight amongst ourselves rather than mobilising together against a common enemy that wants to screw us both over.
Now that being said, being furious is an acceptable response - so long as its directed properly. By all means be enraged at every last one of the people who voted for this. They are prejudiced bigots without exception. They voted to hurt gay people. They voted to confirm that gay people are beneath them. They don’t have an excuse for what they did - there isn’t a good enough excuse. And no, hiding bigotry behind a Bible verse isn’t a good excuse - it just makes the people you’re attacking angry at you AND the religion you’re using to beat them down.
In short, if you voted yes on any of these amendments, you are a vile bigot and people have every right to be disgusted and enraged by your sorry, vile self.
*I've never been happy with the term "African-American" 1) because I'm not American and no-one has ever coined the term "African-British" so it sounds vaguely silly to me and 2) because I fail to see why you should have to qualify someone's nationality because of their race. A black American is an American just as much and without the need for dilution as any other American. I don't see it as being beneficial to use a label that implies outsideness or a diversion of interests or a mixing of nationalities.
And that is what it has done. Denying the right to marry is a horrendous thing. It undermines and devalues relationships. It devalues and disrespects people. It denies protections that are essential and NON-IMITABLE. This law has seriously harmed thousands upon thousands of people for no benefit. I have said on numerous occasions just how essential the right to marry was, so there’s no point in repeating it other than to say that denying it was a truly evil thing to do.
But it is more than that, though that is horrendous, this has done a truly awful things: It has given legitimacy to homophobia.
The constitutions of 3 states, the people of 3 states, have just said homophobia is ok. Homophobia isn’t bad. Homophobia is acceptable. Homophobia is officially sanctioned. These states and the people who voted for these vile measures in these states have said that homophobia is good and right and should be enshrined in law.
I’ve said before that homophobia is one of the few “acceptable” prejudices. It’s one of the prejudices you can wear openly and even drip with venom and it still not be considered rude or outside of civilised behaviour . These 3 states have not only confirmed that but they have given it the stamp of approval. These states have given a green light to prejudice and waved the flag for bigotry.
Homophobia is ok to these states. And that in turn says that being gay is NOT ok. These states have enshrined in their constitutions that gay people are less. That gay people are not worthy of the same rights or respect or consideration. In these states, it is official, so official they had to enshrine it in their most fundamental documents: Gay People are Inferior.
And that’s a great message to send, isn’t it?
I can feel the rage about these passing - feel and share it. But it needs to be directed appropriately. A lot of the anger has been aimed at ethnic minorities who voted disproportionately for the Californian amendment. Yes, the fact that a large number of black* people who voted in Cali voted for proposition 8 is certain an issue for concern and belongs on the list of Shit that Needs Sorting but to blame it on an entire race is beyond stupid - as well as prejudiced. (Apart from anything else, logistically black people don't have the numbers to have been a deciding factor on the vote - don't let prejudice and a convenient scape goat colour outrage)
Believe me, nothing would please the right wing bigots more than for gay people and black people to fight amongst ourselves rather than mobilising together against a common enemy that wants to screw us both over.
Now that being said, being furious is an acceptable response - so long as its directed properly. By all means be enraged at every last one of the people who voted for this. They are prejudiced bigots without exception. They voted to hurt gay people. They voted to confirm that gay people are beneath them. They don’t have an excuse for what they did - there isn’t a good enough excuse. And no, hiding bigotry behind a Bible verse isn’t a good excuse - it just makes the people you’re attacking angry at you AND the religion you’re using to beat them down.
In short, if you voted yes on any of these amendments, you are a vile bigot and people have every right to be disgusted and enraged by your sorry, vile self.
*I've never been happy with the term "African-American" 1) because I'm not American and no-one has ever coined the term "African-British" so it sounds vaguely silly to me and 2) because I fail to see why you should have to qualify someone's nationality because of their race. A black American is an American just as much and without the need for dilution as any other American. I don't see it as being beneficial to use a label that implies outsideness or a diversion of interests or a mixing of nationalities.